Sitting there in class, I had a whole list of questions and comments about the lesson. Let me know what you think:
1. Besides the obvious awkwardness (etc etc) about the object lesson, why gag and tie up the class leader for this lesson? If the lesson is teaching how to communicate, I don't think this object lesson even fits (again, even if it WERE a good idea to tie someone up etc). To do something to the class president visually suggests that the president may have perfect communication skills but something is holding them back. This may have worked if we were talking about not following a good leader - that our lack of attention and trust ties up the prophet or Bishop or even a class leader. The message I see and the message of the lesson don't even match up.
2. Our girls didn't mind being told where to sit, so that part of the lesson didn't work either. :)
3. And, as usual, the questions in the manual didn't provoke much thought, usually resulting in the teacher giving the obvious answer anyway. (I'm going to write a whole post on the manual's questions, so more on that sometime.)
4. And I'll leave off specifics of the suggested lesson development to address a few other points:
A. Why was this not taken as an opportunity to talk about callings and the ability of the Spirit to guide a leader?
B. Why did we not talk about the role of counselors?
C. Why didn't we use this as a major opportunity to train the class on how to be a presidency?
D. Why didn't we even quote the handbook's discussion of a YW class presidency?
E. Why quote some scriptures that seem somehow to talk about speaking, when we could have looked at one or two leaders in some detail?
F. Why not look at all the wonderful talks about "focus on people, not programs" etc?
G. Listing all these great attributes probably mostly made the current leaders feel inadequate.
H. Are we assuming that girls don't need to talk about the doctrinal foundations of leadership, just how to communicate? I hope not.
To get all my thoughts on the table and be perfectly honest, the way the lesson was set up it took what could have been a wonderful training day into a bland discussion without any responsibility given to the girls. It was a lesson of telling them things they already knew or adding a tidbit here or there without any real thought - certainly without letting them think.
I almost want to say that we as leaders too often are the ones binding up the class leaders, doing things for them, and not trusting them to listen to the Spirit and lead. But do we ever teach them they can do that? Do we show confidence not only in them but in God to guide them?
What are your thoughts?





